Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

668 So. 2d 1057

M.U. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 23, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-02-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1997

1 state decisions

Relies on HLL v. State · T.A.R. v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-02-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PATTERSON, Judge.

¶1The appellant challenges his adjudication of guilt for aggravated assault with a firearm and trespass and his commitment to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. We find no error in the appellant’s adjudication and commitment and therefore affirm. However, as the appellant correctly argues, the trial court erred in imposing a general sentence for two separate offenses. See T.A.R. v. State, 640 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); H.L.L. v. State, 595 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we remand for the entry of a separate disposition order for each offense.

¶2Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, Acting C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.
/668/so2d/1057 · .json · Public domain