Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 So. 2d 1281 - State v. Becnel

668 So. 2d 1281 - State v. Becnel’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Alexander v. Virginia · State v. Dotson · State v. Davis · 430 So. 2d 650 - State v. Oliver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an informant only supplies the information and does not participate in the transaction, disclosure is not required. * * * On the other hand, when the informant plays a crucial role in the transaction and the defense meets its burden of showing exceptional circumstances justifying disclosure, disclosure is required. Participation in the alleged criminal transaction is the key; if the informant does not participate, the defendant cannot compel disclosure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.