Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 SO2D 152 - Inmin v. State

Inmin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State · 471 So. 2d 493 - Ex Parte Faircloth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`view that [circumstantial] evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution. The test to be applied is whether the jury might reasonably find that the evidence excluded every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt; not whether such evidence excludes every reasonable hypothesis of guilt, but whether a jury might reasonably so conclude .'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he appellant cannot allege as error proceedings in the trial court that were invited by [him] or that were a natural consequence of [his] own action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.