Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

668 So. 2d 214

Frankel v. Thibault

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-01-17

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2016

4 state decisions

Relies on 634 So. 2d 750 - Jacksonville v. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV. · 659 So. 2d 1046 - NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV. CO. v. Jacksonville

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-01-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

GUNTHER, Chief Judge.

¶1Appellant, intervenor below, appeals the issuance of a temporary injunction and appeals a non-final order denying his motion to dissolve the same. We affirm in all respects except we reverse and remand to allow the trial court an opportunity to make an express finding as to whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law. See City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co., 634 So.2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), approved, 659 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1995).

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
/668/so2d/214 · .json · Public domain