State v. Kingston’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dorthey · State v. Sepulvado · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · 593 So. 2d 704 - State v. Scott · 635 So. 2d 398 - State v. Littleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“do not indicate that the trial court has made a `searching inquiry necessary to justify declaring a legislatively mandated sentence unconstitutional', nor do they indicate that the trial court made a `meaningful assessment of any mitigating or aggravating circumstances appropriate to this case.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We're going to take the age into consideration, the fact that the six years he will be serving will be flat time ... And also the Court feels that any higher amount of time would be unjust....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.