Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 SO2D 513 - Murphy v. Droke

Murphy v. Droke’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 512 So. 2d 1341 - Campbell v. Burns · 590 So. 2d 893 - First Bank of Boaz v. Fielder · 474 So. 2d 82 - Otis Elevator Co., Inc. v. Stallworth · Holt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"While the mere failure to perform the promised act is not by itself sufficient evidence of fraudulent intent, for purposes of a promissory-fraud claim, `the factfinder may consider that failure, together with other circumstances, in determining whether, at the time the promise was made, the promisor intended to deceive.'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.