Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2014
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Knop v. McCain · Ex Parte Ledbetter · 491 So. 2d 1046 - Wiggins v. State · 441 So. 2d 1045 - Robinson v. State · 605 So. 2d 1258 - State v. Freeman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the facts of this case, the appellant was not entitled to a jury instruction on criminally negligent homicide. III. The appellant's third claim on direct appeal is that the trial court improperly charged the jury that a stick is not a deadly weapon. The appellant claimed that he killed the victim, who was approaching him while carrying a stick, in self-defense. This issue, however, is not preserved for review because the appellant failed to object to this instruction; in fact, the appellant's counsel stated plainly that he was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'In Robinson v. State , 441 So.2d 1045 , 1047 (Ala.Crim.App. 1983), this court observed that a person who intentionally draws a gun in response to or in anticipation of a confrontation with another is certainly aware of the risk that the gun might discharge; therefore, he cannot be guilty of mere criminal negligence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' "Unless a juror is asked a question which applies to him in a manner demanding response, it is permissible for a juror to remain silent; the juror is under no duty to disclose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.