668 So. 2d 982 - LEAF v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably 819 So. 2d 997 - Gross v. Department of Health (2002), 18 So. 3d 1079 - Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority v. IMC Phosphates Co. (2009)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 2621
Relies on Daniels v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm'n · 444 So. 2d 917 - Roberson v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N · 362 So. 2d 21 - Balino v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVE, ETC. · 652 So. 2d 803 - Cherry Communications, Inc. v. Deason · Asi, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] party who is adversely affected by final agency action is entitled to judicial review.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]here are four requirements for standing to seek ... [judicial] review [of a final agency action]: (1) the action is final; (2) the agency is subject to provisions of the act; (3) the person seeking review was a party to the action; and (4) the party was adversely affected by the action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The APA's definition of party recognizes the need for a much broader zone of party representation at the administrative level than at the appellate level. For example, in rulemaking, a large number of persons may be invited or permitted by the agency to participate as parties in the proceeding, so as to provide information to the agency concerning a broad spectrum of policy considerations affecting proposed rules. See America Balino v. Dept. of Health and Rehab., etc., 362 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Yet, a person who participates in such a proceeding by authorization of a statute or rule, or by permission of an agency, may not necessarily possess any interests which are adversely, or even substantially, affected by the proposed action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.