Duhart v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2010
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McNew v. State · Rojas v. State · Morales v. State · Thomas v. State · Walker v. State of Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]airness would dictate that a defendant be accorded an opportunity to offer evidence in mitigation of punishment after revocation of probation and the adjudication of guilt and before the assessment of punishment if such evidence has not already been elicited during the proceedings. ...”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State · Faerman v. State“[a]fter an adjudication of guilt, all proceedings, including assessment of punishment, pronouncement of sentence, granting of probation, and defendant's appeal continue as if the adjudication of guilt had not been deferred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Issa v. State · Cole v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.