Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 SW2D 867 - Morales v. Lee

Morales v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 111th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Garza v. Alviar · Skillern & Sons, Inc. v. Stewart · JC Penney Company v. Duran · Moore's, Inc. v. Garcia · Szmalec v. Madro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We agree that there is no evidence supporting a finding of false imprisonment. [[Image here]] Considering only the evidence favorable to the verdict, it seems clear that no false imprisonment occurred on April 19, 1978. Threats of future action, such as to call the police and have the plaintiff arrested, are not ordinarily sufficient in themselves to effect an unlawful imprisonment. W. PROSSER TORTS § 11.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.