State v. Giles’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 14 U.S.C. § 89 · 19 U.S.C. § 1581 (Tariff Act of 1930)
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Villamonte-Marquez · State v. Tarantino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“historical fact that seagoing vessels have always been subject to boarding by government officials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McKeen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.