Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 669 F.2d 1157 - Balani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Balani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

669 F.2d 1157 · 1982

Citation profile

242
cited by 242 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2024
most recently cited

123 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 242 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2024 · most notably Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-Pineda (1985), Denko v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003)

123 federal appellate ·

88019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang · Wisconsin v. Illinois · Lewis v. Martin · In re Josephson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 242 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “definite and firm conviction that the court below committed a clear error of judgment in the conclusion it reached upon a weighing of the relevant factors.”
    29 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was made without a rational explanation, inexplicably departed from established policies, or rested on an impermissible basis such as invidious discrimination against a particular race or group.”
    28 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person whose deportation would, in the opinion of the Attorney General, result in extreme hardship to the alien or to his spouse, parent, or child, who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.