Bell v. Cameron Meadows Land Co.’s Empirical Analysis
669 F.2d 1278 · 1982
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 36 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Schneider v. Vennard (1989), Hollinger
18 federal appellate · 36 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc. · Blackie v. Barrack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“had reasonable grounds to believe material facts existed that were misstated or omitted, but nonetheless failed to obtain and disclose such facts although [defendant] could have done so without extraordinary effort”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hollinger“misstatements and omissions caused other shareholders to tender 80% of the outstanding shares, and the success of the tender offer caused plaintiffs ... to tender their shares as well,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.