Brown v. Cuyler’s Empirical Analysis
669 F.2d 155 · 1982
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Daye v. Attorney General of New York (1982), Burkett v. Cunningham (1987)
15 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Edwards v. Arizona · Fay v. Noia · Picard v. Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An applicant shall not be deemed to have exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State ... if he has the right under the law of the State to raise, by any available procedure, the question presented.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hen a federal court is unable to determine unequivocally that an issue has been considered and ruled upon by the state courts, comity requires that the initial determination of the issue be made by the state courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is not enough that the petitioner presents to the state court the facts upon which a federal claim is based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. O'Halloran v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.