Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 669 F.2d 628 - Smith v. Minster Machine Co.

Smith v. Minster Machine Co.’s Empirical Analysis

669 F.2d 628 · 1982

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2012

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Nor-Tex Agencies, Inc. · Kirkland v. General Motors Corporation · 77 Ill. 2d 434 - Rucker v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. · Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. · Bruce v. Martin-Marietta Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if a product is found to be in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user, the manufacturer is not to be excused from liability simply because other manufacturers are producing similar products.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.