Curtis, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
669 F.2d 648 · 1982
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 10703 · 49 U.S.C. § 307 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Midwest Coast Transport, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Midwestern Transportation, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission · 346 F. Supp. 254 - Frozen Foods Express, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he ICC's interpretations of its regulations and the facts supporting a grant or denial of a certificate require recognition of its expertise and our deference thereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.