Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 669 F. Supp. 372 - Bee v. Greaves

669 F. Supp. 372 - Bee v. Greaves’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 2008
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2008

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

30198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may attempt to identify specific hours that should be eliminated, or it may simply reduce the award to account for the limited success. The court necessarily has discretion in making this equitable judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[I]t is often important to analyze and exclude duplication of time spent on aspects of a case where several lawyers, paraprofessionals and/or clerks are working simultaneously.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “courts have historically rejected taxation of the cost of ... travel expenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.