669 F. Supp. 2d 45 - Davis v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1402 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Haines v. Kerner · Kentucky v. Graham · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The United States of America may be sued only insofar as it consents to suit. In all other cases, the federal government enjoys sovereign immunity from suit. FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 475 , 114 S.Ct. 996 , 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994). The United States of America has not consented to suit for constitutional violations, and therefore, this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain a suit for constitutional violations against the [Defendant agency] or any [individual] defendant named in his or her official capacity,””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o action shall be brought ... by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dial v. Kane“[p]risoners' claims supporting Bivens actions ... must first be exhausted administratively”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dial v. Kane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.