Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 669 NE2D 411 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Pawloski v. State · Madden v. State · Dusenberry v. Dusenberry · Cutter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) it is obtained pursuant to: (A) a search warrant that was properly issued upon a determination of probable cause by a neutral and detached magistrate, that is free from obvious defects other than nondeliberate errors made in its preparation, and that was reasonably believed by the ... officer to be valid [[Image here]]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A less stringent standard of review applies and an appellant need only establish prima fa-cie error to win a reversal when the appel-lee fails to file a brief”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Prima facie error means error at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.