Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 669 NW2D 1 - State v. Colosimo

State v. Colosimo’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Prouse · Steven Dewayne Bond v. United States · State v. Sorenson · In Re the Welfare of E.D.J. · State v. Boyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The important role fishing plays in the lives of many Minnesotans and the corresponding need for effective regulation to protect the viability of our state’s fish and game resources recently inspired an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution .... The amendment provides, “Hunting and fishing and the taking of game and fish are a valued part of our heritage that shall be forever preserved for the people and shall be managed by law and regulation for the public good.” Minn. Const, art. XIII, § 12. This provision of the Minnesota Constitution must be considered in our analysis along with the extensive laws and regulations passed to manage fishing for the public good.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “society is prepared to recognize as reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.