Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 669 P2D 533 - Bacon v. Carey Co.

Bacon v. Carey Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2000

16 state decisions

110198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martinez v. State · Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware) · Eager v. Derowitsch · Benson v. Benson · Glover v. Berger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘A court does not abuse its discretion unless it acts in a manner which exceeds the bounds of reason under the circumstances. In determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion, the ultimate issue is whether or not the court could reasonably conclude as it did. An abuse of discretion has been said to mean an error of law committed by the court under the circumstances.’ ” Randolph v. Hays, Wyo., 665 P.2d 500, 504 (1983) (quoting Martinez v. State, Wyo., 611 P.2d 831, 838 (1980)).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““When, in a civil case, the judgment or final order is affirmed, appellee shall recover the cost for typewriting and reproducing his brief, such cost to be computed at the rate allowed by law for making the transcript of the evidence. Unless the court certifies that there was reasonable cause for the appeal, there shall also be taxed as part of the costs in the case, a reasonable fee, to be fixed by the court, not less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500.00), to the counsel of the appel-lee, and to the appellee damages in such sum as may be reasonable, not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the standards for review of discretionary exercise cannot readily be reduced to black-letter principles.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.