Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 669 SO2D 1014 - Riddle v. State

Riddle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2013

11 state decisions

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Doerr v. Doerr · Western Farm Credit Bank v. Fobian · Sorrell v. Dayton Women's Health Center, Inc. · 607 So. 2d 369 - Hull v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' Kitchens v. Maye , 623 So.2d 1082 , 1086 (Ala. 1993) (quoting United States v. Grinnell Corp. , 384 U.S. 563 , 583 , 86 S.Ct. 1698 , 1710 , 16 L.Ed.2d 778 , 793 (1966)) (emphasis added in Kitchens ). A trial court's denial of a motion to recuse will not be reversed on appeal 'unless clear evidence of bias is shown.' Adkins v. State , 600 So.2d [1054] at 1062 [(Ala.Cr.App. 1990), remanded on other grounds, 600 So.2d 1067 (Ala. 1992)].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “' Bush v. State, 616 So.2d 394, 395 (Ala.Cr.App.1993) (quoting Richie v. State, 481 So.2d 454, 455 (Ala.Cr.App.1985)).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[E]xhibits attached to a brief are not evidence and cannot be considered by this Court on appeal. Huff v. State , 596 So.2d 16 , 19 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991). `”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.