Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

669 So. 2d 1047

669 So.2d 1047

21 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 119

State v. Hall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 14, 1996

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1996-03-14

Relies on 667 So. 2d 199 - State v. Peterson · Hall v. State

Decided 1996-03-14

WELLS, Justice.

¶1We have for review Hall v. State, 660 So.2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Peterson, 667 So.2d 199 (Fla.1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

¶2In Peterson, we held that under the sentencing guidelines, a conviction must be scored as prior record, without regard to whether an appeal is taken. In accordance with our decision in Peterson, we quash the decision of the district court in this case and direct that the sentence imposed by the trial court be affirmed.1

¶3It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ„ concur.

¶4. If these convictions on appeal are subsequently overturned, Hall would, of course, be able to file for postconviction relief from the sentence.

/669/so2d/1047 · .json · Public domain