Allen v. Rawlins’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Arceneaux v. Domingue · Canter v. Koehring Company · Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. · 388 So. 2d 707 - Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a motorist fails to see what he should have seen, then the law charges him with having seen what he should have seen, and the court examines his subsequent conduct on the premise that he did see what he should have seen.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]o fixed rule exists for determining what conduct constitutes negligence; thus, the facts and environmental characteristics of each case must be considered and treated individually.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Este v. Roussel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.