¶1AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
¶2In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Johnson, 669 So.2d 205 (Ala.1995), the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied.
¶3PETITION DENIED.
669 So. 2d 207
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided October 19, 1995
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1995-10-19
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2000
1 state decisions
Relies on State v. Ackerman
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1995-10-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
¶2In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Johnson, 669 So.2d 205 (Ala.1995), the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied.
¶3PETITION DENIED.