State v. Perrilloux’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 622 So. 2d 198 - State v. Bourque · 630 So. 2d 1278 - State v. Robertson · 530 So. 2d 526 - State v. Copeland · 514 So. 2d 84 - State v. Comeaux · 559 So. 2d 1310 - State v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The regular peremptory challenges allowed by law shall not be used against the alternate jurors. The court shall determine how many additional peremptory challenges shall be allowed, and each the defendant shall have an equal number of such challenges. The state shall have as many peremptory challenges as the defense. The additional peremptory challenges may be used only against alternate jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“neither argued, nor proved that he was forced to accept a questionable juror because he had exhausted his peremptory challenges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.