Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 A2D 687 - Amos v. Cummings

Amos v. Cummings’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1981
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1981

5 state decisions

2019491950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. Cohen · Hartman v. Lubar · Lubar v. Hartman · Wood v. District of Columbia · Congressional Amusement Corp. v. Weltman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The provision requiring the tenant to use the basement for commercial purposes was a reasonable one. The'nonconforming commercial use in a residential district enhances the value of the property and the landlord had the right to insist that this use be maintained in order that it not be lost by reason of nonuse or abandonment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.