Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 A.D.3d 499

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2009-11-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2024

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-11-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered September 19, 2008, which, to the extent appealable, denied defendant’s motion to renew his motion to vacate a default judgment and restore the case to the trial calendar, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, renewal granted and, upon renewal, the motion to vacate the default granted and the matter remanded for trial.

¶2Defendant’s attorney’s representation that a former employee had been misdirecting or misplacing mail provides a reasonable excuse for his failure to present such evidence of law office failure on defendant’s original motion to vacate the default judgment as well as his failure to appear in court on various dates (see Solowij v Otis El. Co., 260 AD2d 226 [1999]). Defendant’s affidavit shows a meritorious defense. Concur—Gonzalez, EJ., Andrias, Saxe, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

/67/ad3d/499 · .json · Public domain