Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 Ala. 252

Warwick v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1880

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1880-12-15

Appbal from Perry Circuit'Court. Tried before Hon. G. H. Craig. This was a motion made by W. M. Brooks against J. E. Warwick, sheriff of Talladega county, and the sureties on his official bond, for a summary judgment for the failure to return an execution.

Relies on Porter v. Burleson & Davis · Patterson v. Blakeney

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1880-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1922

5 state decisions

2018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SOMERYILLE, J.

¶1— This is a summary motion against the sheriff and his sureties for failing to return an execution within the time required by law. The Circuit Court rendered judgment final by default, on motion of plaintiff, without the intervention of a jury. The assignment of error based on this action of the court must be sustained. The motion is not an “action founded on any instrument of writing ascertaining the plaintiff’s demand,” within the meaning of section 3022 of the Code. There should have been evidence introduced to establish the truth of the statements, showing the liability of the defendants for the alleged neglect of duty. The issue in dispute could only be determined by the verdict of a jury, and was improperly adjudged by the court. — Porter v. Burleson, 38 Ala. 343; Patterson v. Blakeney, 33 Ala. 338; Byrnes v. Haynes, Minor. 286; 2 Brick. Dig., p. 135; § 61, et seq.

¶2The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

/67/ala/252 · .json · Public domain