State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 1988 · most notably State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court (1976), State v. Phillips (1967)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dorsey v. State · Lawrence v. State · B.W.L. Sam v. State · Taylor v. State of Arizona · State of Arizona v. Pierce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * a system, plan or scheme embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that the proof of one tends to establish the other, * * *.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““However we think that the court very properly refused to admit in evidence the ‘booking slips’ from the police department. A mere reading of the comments on defendants’ exhibit No. 2 for identification, which is typical of the exhibits offered, ‘This woman was drunk on the street. She told Officer Norris that she had stayed with five men this afternoon. She was in company with a known prostitute Josephine Bustomonte/ shows its inadmissibility. It is the rankest kind of hearsay, a mere informal memoranda of possible acts and not proof of acts.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bubnash
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.