Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 ARKAPP 227 - Rasberry v. Ivory

Rasberry v. Ivory’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2025

10 state decisions

601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walsh v. Mayer · Miller County v. Opportunities, Inc. · Boatman v. Dawkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he provisions requiring it to be asserted in a particular mode and within a fixed time, are conditions and qualifications attached to the right itself, and do not form a part of the law of the remedy. If it is not asserted within the permitted period, it ceases to exist and cannot be claimed or enforced in any form.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.