In Re Owens’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably Vertientes, Ltd. v. Internor Trade, Inc. (1988), In Re Stern (1987)
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1305 · 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on United States v. International Horizons, Inc. · Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. Lederer · Pigott Conestoga Ceramic Tile Distributors Inc · In Re W.T. Grant Co. · In Re the Overly-Hautz Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Time for filing [[Image here]] (1) On motion of the United States ..., the court may extend the time for filing of a claim by the United States....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Butcher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.