Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 Cal. 624

People v. Strother

California Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1885

California Supreme Court · decided 1885-10-30

<p>Application for a writ of mandate. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1885-10-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1941

7 state decisions

201885189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Myrick, J.

¶1Application for mandamus to compel the auditor of the city and county of San Francisco to enter in his books an increase of the assessments by adding a percentage in accordance with the direction of the State board of equalization.

¶2The reasons presented on behalf of the auditor why the writ should not issue.have been considered by us. For lack of time we cannot enter into a full discussion in this judgment of those reasons. As the time for performing the duty is rapidly passing, it is of more immediate importance to know the duty than its reasons. Other cases are before us involving some of the questions here concerned; and in those cases we shall give our views more at length. ' •

¶3The substantial question involved is whether the amendment of section 9, article xiii., of the Constitution was properly adopted. Independent of that question there is but little in the objections urged on behalf of respondent; no matter appears to us which renders it impossible for him to comply with the order.

¶4We are of opinion that the amendment referred to_was constitutionally adopted.

¶5Let the writ issue as prayed for,, forthwith.

¶6Morrison, C. J., Ross, J., and McKinstry, J., concurred.

/67/cal/624 · .json · Public domain