Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Cal. 2d 845 - In Re Hoffman

67 Cal. 2d 845 - In Re Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

211
cited by 211 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 172 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 211 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights (1974), 23 Cal. 3d 899 - Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979)

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 172 state decisions

680196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Shelton v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 211 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]ersons can be excluded entirely from areas where their presence would threaten personal danger or block the flow of passenger or carrier traffic, such as doorways and loading areas”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The primary uses of municipal property can amply be protected by ordinances that prohibit activities that interfere with those uses____ First Amendment activities [cannot] be prohibited solely because the property involved is not maintained primarily as a forum for such activities. [I]n the present case, the test is not whether petitioners’ use of the station was a railway use but whether it interfered with that use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.