Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 COLO 452 - Smith v. People

Smith v. People’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2009

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

201919192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chase v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is plain that the purpose of a recognizance is merely to insure the presence for trial of a person accused of a bailable offense. The enriching of the public treasury is no part of the object at which the proceeding is aimed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.