Boretti v. Panacea Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably 71 Conn. App. 217 - State v. Colon (2002), Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2002)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cruz v. Drezek · In Re DC · New London Federal Savings Bank v. Tucciarone · State v. Francis · Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On the question of notice the triers consideration must be confined to the defendant's knowledge and realization of the specific condition causing the injury, and such knowledge cannot be found to exist from a knowledge of the general or overall conditions obtaining on the premises.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.