Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 CONNAPP 527 - Brent v. Lebowitz

Brent v. Lebowitz’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2020

15 state decisions

110200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Turner v. Turner · Unkelbach v. McNary · Holley v. Holley · Charpentier v. Charpentier · Narcisco v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Accordingly, support agreements that are not in accordance with the financial dictates of the guidelines are not enforceable unless one of the guidelines' deviation criteria is present . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “substantiate its decision by making the explicit findings mandated by the guidelines, nor did it restrict its deviation to the criteria prescribed by the guidelines.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.