Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 F.2d 205 - Cunningham v. Commissioner

Cunningham v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

67 F.2d 205 · 1933

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 1968
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1968

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

801933194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Resolved that in appreciation of Mr. •Cunningham’s excellent guidance of this Corporation through times of difficulty and depression a sum of $15,000 be, and is hereby, awarded to Mr. Cunningham as an honorarium.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.