Warner v. Buffalo Drydock Co.’s Empirical Analysis
67 F.2d 540 · 1933
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2002 · most notably Hartmann v. Time, Inc. (1947), Sack v. Low (1973)
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Campbell v. Holt · William M'Elmoyle for the Use of Isaac Bailey v. John J Cohen · United States v. Oregon Lumber Co. · Robert Brent v. The President and Directors of the Bank of Washington · The Bank of the United States v. Andrew Donnally
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The decisions of the Supreme Court and the English cases all indicate that the judgment of the court of a foreign state which dismisses a cause of action because of the statute of limitations of the forum is not a decision on the merits and is not a bar to a new action upon the identical claim in the courts of another state.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““All the foreign court adjudicates as a fact is that the action has been brought after the expiration of the statutory period, and, as a matter of law, that the remedy is barred in that court.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.