Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 F.3d 256 - Garcia v. Concannon

Garcia v. Concannon’s Empirical Analysis

67 F.3d 256 · 1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 2015

Relies on Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. · Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. · Stewart v. Ragland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f the individual is not eligible for the Program at the time the disqualification period is to begin, the period shall be postponed until the individual applies for and is determined eligible for benefits....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.