Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 F.3d 294

Docket No. 95-6416.

Ginyard v. Lee

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 24, 1995. Decided Sept. 13, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-13

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 1995 · most notably Grenier v. Cyanamid Plastics, Inc. (1995), Joe Facen, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections (1995)

31 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-09-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jeffery Ginyard, Appellant pro se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ginyard v. Lee, No. CA-94-98 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 1995). We grant Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/67/f3d/294 · .json · Public domain