No. 94-2059.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Apr. 28, 1995.
Decided Sept. 13, 1995.
Owen Ray Peyton, Jr., appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peyton v. Lueotke, No. CA-94-1630 (D.Md. July 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED