Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 F.3d 297

Docket No. 94-7405.

United States v. Mitchell

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-12

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States America v. R McClary

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-09-12

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Covey Mitchell, appellant pro se.

Steven Lawrence Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's "motion for ruling" and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. CA-92-100-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/67/f3d/297 · .json · Public domain