Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 F.3d 303

Docket No. 95-1440.

Lalk v. Card

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Sept. 6, 1995. Filed: Sept. 26, 1995.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-06

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · David P. Bladdick v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation · Robinson v. Cavanaugh

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-09-06

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Ronald Lalk appeals from the district court's1 order dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Lalk's complaint, because it contains no nonfrivolous claims. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (complaint is frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis in either law or fact); Robinson v. Cavanaugh, 20 F.3d 892, 894 (8th Cir.1994) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri

/67/f3d/303 · .json · Public domain