Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 F.3d 310

Docket No. 95-15470.

United States v. Mickle

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 18, 1995.* Decided Sept. 27, 1995.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-27

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Louis Sogoian

Decided 1995-09-27

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM

¶2

Former federal prisoner Porter Wayland Mickle appeals pro se the district court's denial of his second 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed February 21, 1995.

¶3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

/67/f3d/310 · .json · Public domain