Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 F.3d 34 - United States v. Pipitone

United States v. Pipitone’s Empirical Analysis

67 F.3d 34 · 1995

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably United States v. Yemitan (1995), United States v. Rodgers (1996)

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

330199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 4046 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · Hill v. United States · United States v. Addonizio · Toliver v. County of Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party who fails to raise an issue on direct appeal and subsequently endeavors to litigate the issue via a § 2255 petition must 'show that there was cause for failing to raise the issue, and prejudice resulting therefrom.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'cause' ... must be something external to the petitioner, something that cannot be fairly attributed to him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he Bureau’s authority to vary the thir-tymonth limitation expressed in § 4046(a) is certainly not free from doubt.” Id. at 37 n. 2. 6 . The Commentary to USSG § 5F1.7 notes that under procedures promulgated by the Bureau of Prisons,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.