Baker v. Cuomo

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Petition for Rehearing, Submitted May 26, 1995. Decided Oct. 10, 1995.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-10-10

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2004

3 federal appellate ·

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“the applicability of the Voting Rights Act.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Baker v. Pataki

Relies on Baker v. Cuomo

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-10-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Before: NEWMAN, Chief Judge, KEARSE, MINER, ALTIMARI, MAHONEY, WALKER, McLAUGHLIN, JACOBS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.*

Suggestion for rehearing in banc of an appeal of a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Vincent L. Broderick, Judge) dismissing a complaint of state prisoners alleging denial of voting rights. Panel remanded, and denied petition for rehearing, Baker v. Cuomo, 58 F.3d 814 (2d Cir.1995). Rehearing in banc ordered.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The Court orders a rehearing in banc, limited to the issue of the applicability of the Voting Rights Act. See Baker v. Cuomo, 58 F.3d 814 (2d Cir.1995).

Circuit Judges Ralph K. Winter, Pierre N. Leval, Guido Calabresi, and Jose A. Cabranes recused themselves