Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 F.3d 484 - Wb Ej Ej v. Matula

Wb Ej Ej v. Matula’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

209
cited by 209 later decisions
6
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

57 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 209 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Jack Davoll, Sellers Sellers v. The School Board of the City of Manassas Virginia E

57 district · 8 state decisions

10701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mathews v. Eldridge · Anderson v. Creighton · Sandin v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 209 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to restrict or limit the rights, procedures, and remedies available under the Constitution, title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or other Federal statutes protecting the rights of children and youth with disabilities ....”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States, as defined in section 705(20) of this title, shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance ....”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]here appear to be few differences, if any, between IDEA's affirmative duty and § 504's negative prohibition.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.