Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 F.3d 634 - United States v. Berchiolly

United States v. Berchiolly’s Empirical Analysis

67 F.3d 634 · 1995

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
April 2015
most recently cited

33 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably United States v. Brack (1999), United States v. Yusuff (1996)

33 federal appellate ·

280199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · Rauer v. United States · Mitan v. United States · Rita v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only when the record is devoid of any evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which a jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The district court's factual determination regarding the possession of a dangerous weapon during the course of a drug conspiracy is reviewed for clear error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the possession was in furtherance of a jointly undertaken criminal activity that was reasonably foreseeable by the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.