Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 F.3d 779 - Trulis v. Barton

Trulis v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis

67 F.3d 779 · 1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Stoll v. Gottlieb · Pledger v. Medlock · Republic Supply Co. v. Shoaf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]ome explanation or indication of the basis for the district court's decision is necessary”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.